Pavithra Gowda was sexually harassed by Renukaswamy!; Lawyers submit written reasons to Supreme Court

Renukaswamy's murder case has reached a dramatic stage. The supreme court is currently hearing the bail plea of A1 accused Pavithra Gowda and A2 accused actor Darshan.

• Points of argument in favour of Pavithra Gowda: Allegations of sexual harassment: The lawyer mentioned in the written argument a serious allegation that Pavithra Gowda was sexually harassed by Renukaswamy.
• Truth without traffic: It is said that there was no contact between Pavitra and the other accused on the day of the incident, there was no mobile data or call evidence.
• Criminal conspiracy not proved: The important point is that the prosecution has failed to prove full-fledged criminal conspiracy.
• Personal responsibility: "I am a single mother, two daughters of Class 10, an elderly parent – for whom I am the support".
• No criminal background: It has been argued that the arrest of Pavithra Gowda, who has no criminal antecedents, is a draconian step.
• Points of argument on behalf of Darshan: The fact of the arrest: Though Darshan was arrested in Mysuru, an FIR has been registered by the Bengaluru Police. Meanwhile, no written reason for the arrest was given till 6:30 pm – a violation of the law.
• Lack of evidence: There is no evidence that Darshan was directly involved in the kidnapping or murder. There is also no evidence of calls or WhatsApp messages with the other accused.
• Question of credibility of witnesses: The statements given by Kiran, Mallikarjun, Narendra Singh have been recorded in delay and appear to be lacking in credibility.
• The three-second video controversy: It has been argued that the three-second video quoted by the government is not in the chargesheet or in the high court records.
• Humanitarian and legal approach to bail: Pavithra Gowda is the main force for woman, mother and financial security, the lawyer said. At the same time, it is reiterated in the argument that Darshan has not violated any of the conditions.

These arguments are the result of the complex dialogue that takes place between law and humanity. Allegations of sexual harassment, technical errors and lack of evidence all together form an important moment in this high-profile case. The Supreme Court is likely to take a final decision on the basis of this monitoring in the coming days. This is not just a matter of two, it is a challenge to the truth of the law.